Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guamanians/Chamorros

Zimbabweans

Fair
Exceptional
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,580,120 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 52.5 Zimbabweans.
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $45,804, a difference of 9.9%), median family income ($101,061 compared to $110,011, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $106,849, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $51,259, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $65,854, a difference of 4.2%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricGuamanian/ChamorroZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,678
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,061
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Good
$86,255
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,933
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,661
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,717
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,423
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,569
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,170
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,187
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Fair
26.3%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.3%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricGuamanian/ChamorroZimbabwean
Poverty
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
9.5%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuamanian/ChamorroZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuamanian/ChamorroZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.7%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
84.0%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.7%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (48.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuamanian/ChamorroZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
66.6%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
28.7%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.3%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.5%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.2%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
6.4%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.7%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricGuamanian/ChamorroZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%