Malaysian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Malaysian
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Malaysians
Zimbabweans
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Malaysian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,527,771 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.598% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 598.2 Zimbabweans.
Malaysian vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $45,804, a difference of 16.9%), median family income ($95,230 compared to $110,011, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $65,854, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.69%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $40,798, a difference of 9.4%).
Income Metric | Malaysian | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,194 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,230 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,064 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,844 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,772 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,298 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,615 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,291 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,517 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,244 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Fair 26.3% |
Malaysian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Poverty Metric | Malaysian | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Poor 9.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Malaysian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Malaysian | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Malaysian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Malaysian | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.2% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Malaysian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.5%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (45.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Malaysian | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.9% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Malaysian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.0%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Malaysian | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 6.4% |
Malaysian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 60.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.1%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Malaysian | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.2% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.6% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Malaysian vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Disability Metric | Malaysian | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |