Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guyanese
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guyanese
Zimbabweans
2,059
SOCIAL INDEX
18.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
273rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Guyanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,219,771 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Zimbabweans.
Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 43.8%), median family income ($93,373 compared to $110,011, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,966 compared to $106,849, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,973 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.43%), median earnings ($45,470 compared to $48,229, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $51,259, a difference of 7.7%).
Income Metric | Guyanese | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,949 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,373 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,734 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,470 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,613 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,973 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,210 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,940 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,966 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,351 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 18.3% | Fair 26.3% |
Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 76.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 58.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Poverty Metric | Guyanese | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 60.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 56.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Guyanese | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 24.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 41.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guyanese | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.1% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.2% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.4%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Guyanese | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.6% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.2% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 224.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 84.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 28.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 61.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 76.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guyanese | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 29.3% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 70.8% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 3.5% | Good 6.4% |
Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 75.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 64.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Guyanese | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.5% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.0% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.3% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.3%), hearing disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.84%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Guyanese | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.3% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |