Hispanic or Latino vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,787 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($85,647 compared to $110,011, a difference of 28.4%), per capita income ($35,688 compared to $45,804, a difference of 28.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,832 compared to $65,854, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($34,421 compared to $40,798, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 83.5%), receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 67.0%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.35%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.7%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 31.7%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.3%), family households (67.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (44.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 75.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 72.8%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.3%).