Hmong vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Zimbabweans
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,545,087 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.927. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.418% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 418.0 Zimbabweans.
Hmong vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $106,849, a difference of 21.3%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $110,011, a difference of 20.5%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $45,804, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,259, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($42,111 compared to $48,229, a difference of 14.5%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Fair 26.3% |
Hmong vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 22.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Hmong vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 57.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Hmong vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Hmong vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.27%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Hmong vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Good 6.4% |
Hmong vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.8%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.22%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Hmong vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |