Immigrants from Philippines vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,398,264 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $51,259, a difference of 13.0%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $98,586, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,266 compared to $48,229, a difference of 0.080%), householder income over 65 years ($66,161 compared to $65,854, a difference of 0.47%), and median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.5%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.13%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.5%), family households (68.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.39%), currently married (47.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.54%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.6%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.5%).