Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Turkey
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Turkey

Zimbabweans

Excellent
Exceptional
8,861
SOCIAL INDEX
86.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
43rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Turkey Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,983,969 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Turkey communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Turkey corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Zimbabweans.
Immigrants from Turkey Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,368 compared to $45,804, a difference of 12.1%), median male earnings ($62,728 compared to $56,302, a difference of 11.4%), and median earnings ($52,960 compared to $48,229, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,672 compared to $65,854, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,503 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.4%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricImmigrants from TurkeyZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,368
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,325
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,964
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,960
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,728
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,066
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,503
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,258
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,407
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,672
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.26%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from TurkeyZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.5%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from TurkeyZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.90%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from TurkeyZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
84.0%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.7%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.0%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.55%), and married-couple households (46.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from TurkeyZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.8%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.7%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.3%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from TurkeyZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.6%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from TurkeyZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.4%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.0%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.79%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
Immigrants from Turkey vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from TurkeyZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%