Immigrants from Uganda vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,925,488 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to a decrease of 10.3 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $65,854, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $110,011, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.14%), median earnings ($48,041 compared to $48,229, a difference of 0.39%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.2%), receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.9%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and bachelor's degree (40.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.79%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.3%).