Portuguese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Portuguese
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Portuguese
Zimbabweans
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Portuguese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,624,641 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Zimbabweans.
Portuguese vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $65,854, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $51,259, a difference of 6.2%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,032 compared to $48,229, a difference of 0.41%), median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.64%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $98,586, a difference of 0.86%).
Income Metric | Portuguese | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,362 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,286 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,976 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,032 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,663 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,177 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,436 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,429 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,309 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,440 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Fair 26.3% |
Portuguese vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 28.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Poverty Metric | Portuguese | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.8% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Portuguese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Portuguese | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Portuguese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Portuguese | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.0% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.4% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.4% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Portuguese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 17.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.38%), currently married (47.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.87%).
Family Structure Metric | Portuguese | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Portuguese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Portuguese | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.4% |
Portuguese vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Portuguese | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.3% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 92.0% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.1% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Poor 13.9% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Portuguese vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.1%).
Disability Metric | Portuguese | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.5% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |