Chippewa vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,314,754 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $90,618, a difference of 28.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $106,849, a difference of 27.3%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $110,011, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,259, a difference of 9.0%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,798, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 54.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.0%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.7%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 81.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 60.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 48.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.030%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 55.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 59.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 43.2%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.79%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.0%).