Blackfeet vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,837,224 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to a decrease of 9.9 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,717 compared to $110,011, a difference of 24.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $106,849, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($73,509 compared to $90,618, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $51,259, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $40,798, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.1%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 50.6%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 15.6%), single male poverty (15.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.9%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.6%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.8%).