Thai vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Thai
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Thais

Zimbabweans

Exceptional
Exceptional
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Thai Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,514,715 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Zimbabweans.
Thai Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Thai vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $56,302, a difference of 28.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($121,778 compared to $98,586, a difference of 23.5%), and median earnings ($59,237 compared to $48,229, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $65,854, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $51,259, a difference of 15.5%), and wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 15.8%).
Thai vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricThaiZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,307
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,281
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$110,648
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,237
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$72,135
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$47,577
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$59,187
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$121,778
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$129,560
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,099
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
30.5%
Fair
26.3%

Thai vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Thai vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricThaiZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.3%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
9.5%

Thai vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Thai vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricThaiZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Thai vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Thai vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricThaiZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.9%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.3%
Exceptional
84.0%

Thai vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 19.4%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.67%), family households (67.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (50.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 8.2%).
Thai vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricThaiZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
67.2%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.0%
Exceptional
28.7%

Thai vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Thai vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricThaiZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.4%

Thai vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 22.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.070%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
Thai vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricThaiZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
73.4%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
68.6%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
57.4%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
50.1%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%

Thai vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.3%).
Thai vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricThaiZimbabwean
Disability
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.1%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%