Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,959,857 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.222% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 221.6 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $52,638, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $66,620, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($50,274 compared to $50,741, a difference of 0.93%), median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $41,771, a difference of 1.3%), and median household income ($91,446 compared to $94,091, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.2%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.30%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 11.4%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.41%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.7%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.13%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%).