Immigrants from Sudan vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,749,543 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Sudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.766. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sudan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sudan corresponds to an increase of 59.0 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,109 compared to $105,089, a difference of 22.0%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,781 compared to $112,175, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,511 compared to $41,771, a difference of 8.5%), householder income over 65 years ($59,248 compared to $66,620, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,791 compared to $52,638, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 37.9%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.62%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.5%), married-couple households (41.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.0%), master's degree (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.8%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.6%).