Comanche vs Immigrants from Scotland Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Immigrants from Scotland
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Immigrants from Scotland
25.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Immigrants from Scotland Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,354,794 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 25.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,087,969 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 19.4%, a difference of 31.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 10.1% |
| Maximum | 75.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 67.8% | 89.9% |
| Mean | 34.6% | 26.0% |
| Median | 29.9% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.8% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.1% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.3% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 15.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |