Immigrants from Iran vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,400,602 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Iran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iran within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iran corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,759 compared to $49,893, a difference of 15.8%), median household income ($108,055 compared to $94,091, a difference of 14.8%), and median family income ($130,894 compared to $114,392, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,880 compared to $52,638, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($75,081 compared to $66,620, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 17.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and poverty (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 26.9%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.90%), married-couple households (48.8% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.090%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.6%), professional degree (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.5%), and master's degree (21.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.3%).