Jamaican vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,977,262 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Jamaican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jamaicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jamaicans corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 46.7%), per capita income ($39,231 compared to $49,893, a difference of 27.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,327 compared to $112,175, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,929 compared to $52,638, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($38,670 compared to $41,771, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($43,343 compared to $50,741, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 82.4%), family poverty (11.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 50.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.2%), births to unmarried women (38.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.29%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.12, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 115.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 43.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.8% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 36.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.9%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 24.9%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.41%), disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.3%).