Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,618,625 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.546% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to an increase of 545.8 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,277 compared to $66,620, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,267 compared to $112,175, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,820 compared to $41,771, a difference of 0.12%), householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $52,638, a difference of 0.30%), and median earnings ($50,227 compared to $50,741, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.2%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.19%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.69%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.3% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.2%), currently married (47.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.1%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.31%).