Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,263,110 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $112,796, a difference of 15.8%), and median male earnings ($53,715 compared to $62,121, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $54,179, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $43,835, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $65,497, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 24.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.56%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.62%), and family households (60.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 0.070%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.2%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.7%).