Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,749,564 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.818. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 97.6 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,983, a difference of 63.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $112,796, a difference of 53.7%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $96,292, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,179, a difference of 5.2%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,835, a difference of 24.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 121.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 117.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 104.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 171.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 133.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 130.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 104.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 88.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.22, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 104.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 94.4%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 94.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.26%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 80.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 72.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 20.3%).