Immigrants from Belize vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,556,420 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Belize communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belize within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belize corresponds to a decrease of 11.9 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($47,809 compared to $62,121, a difference of 29.9%), median family income ($89,197 compared to $115,880, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,141 compared to $107,650, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,223 compared to $54,179, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($37,056 compared to $43,835, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,665 compared to $65,497, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 46.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 37.2%), and family poverty (11.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and single male poverty (13.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 36.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.39 compared to 3.22, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 93.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 65.1%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.8%).