British vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,929,098 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.896. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 204.6 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($39,772 compared to $43,835, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,359 compared to $107,650, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,940 compared to $65,497, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $54,179, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,264 compared to $112,796, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 12.6%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 79.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%).