Immigrants from Guyana vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,886,516 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 43.3%), median family income ($92,513 compared to $115,880, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $112,796, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $54,179, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $43,835, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,495 compared to $65,497, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 62.9%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 32.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.9%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 47.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.6%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.22, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 117.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 73.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 22.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 50.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 62.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 92.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 55.9%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.5%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and hearing disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.0%).