Pima vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,682,801 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $43,003, a difference of 40.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $99,093, a difference of 35.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,672, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,436, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $93,694, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 168.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 125.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 25.2%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 143.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 122.9%), and female unemployment (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 94.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 27.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 49.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.29%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 80.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 53.5%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 52.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.35%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 62.7%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.5%).