Shoshone vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,640,822 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.879. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.972% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 972.0 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $99,093, a difference of 18.5%), per capita income ($37,072 compared to $43,003, a difference of 16.0%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $101,634, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $57,975, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $52,672, a difference of 8.1%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.6%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.9%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 6.8%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 55.2%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.07, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 37.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.8%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.9%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.66%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (13.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 2.8%).