Latvian vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,066,014 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.146% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 145.7 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $43,003, a difference of 22.4%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $101,634, a difference of 18.4%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $82,810, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,672, a difference of 0.21%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,436, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 24.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.74%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.07, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 55.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.5%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%).