Immigrants from Lebanon vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,527,613 people shows no correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to an increase of 11.4 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $57,975, a difference of 11.3%), median household income ($91,887 compared to $82,810, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $99,093, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $52,672, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $38,436, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 54.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.15%), receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 35.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.38%), married-couple households (48.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (65.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.7%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.7%).