Lumbee vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,094,142 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.724. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 17.5 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $93,694, a difference of 55.4%), householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $52,672, a difference of 52.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $99,093, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $38,436, a difference of 18.3%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $46,026, a difference of 24.8%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $54,722, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (17.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 108.9%), receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 101.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 100.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 40.3%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 48.9%), and single father poverty (28.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 53.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 64.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 59.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 40.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 50.6%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 40.1%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.61%), family households (63.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.9%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.6%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 63.0%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.8%), ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.7%).