Immigrants from Argentina vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,127,825 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from Argentina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Argentina within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Argentina corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,627 compared to $43,003, a difference of 15.4%), median household income ($92,417 compared to $82,810, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $57,975, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,209 compared to $52,672, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($41,554 compared to $38,436, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 22.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.69%), female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 32.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 14.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 46.7%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.9%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.3%).