Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs French Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,204,266 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.608. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in French Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 10.6 French Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 13.2%), median household income ($91,541 compared to $82,810, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $57,975, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $54,722, a difference of 0.95%), per capita income ($43,539 compared to $43,003, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($47,671 compared to $46,026, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 29.3%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.3%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.99%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 93.0%), high school diploma (87.2% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.42%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and associate's degree (45.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and French Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.7%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.19%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.7%).