Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Jordanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Jordanians
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Jordanian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,125,523 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Jordanians.
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $109,865, a difference of 52.2%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,605, a difference of 50.7%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $91,794, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,796, a difference of 14.5%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $41,464, a difference of 24.9%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Jordanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Excellent $45,605 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Exceptional $109,865 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Exceptional $91,794 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Exceptional $49,632 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Exceptional $58,500 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Exceptional $41,464 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Fair $51,796 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Exceptional $99,186 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Exceptional $109,376 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Exceptional $64,313 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 150.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 132.6%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 119.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.7%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 62.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 64.7%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Jordanian |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 109.6%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 105.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 96.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Jordanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Average 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Good 5.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 10.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Jordanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Fair 36.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 74.8%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 74.6%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Jordanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 83.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.87%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Jordanian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 8.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Excellent 6.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 70.1%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 68.5%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Jordanian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Excellent 2.0% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Excellent 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 95.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 90.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 87.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 68.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Jordanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 94.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 65.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 23.1%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Jordanian |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.3% |