Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Egyptian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Egyptians

Tragic
Excellent
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Egyptian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,944,673 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.912. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Egyptians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 53.3 Egyptians.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Egyptian Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $48,358, a difference of 59.8%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $114,119, a difference of 58.1%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $95,673, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 20.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $54,444, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $43,305, a difference of 30.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamEgyptian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$48,358
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$114,119
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$95,673
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$51,701
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$61,095
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$43,305
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$54,444
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$105,282
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$112,256
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$65,441
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Poor
26.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 150.7%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 131.4%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 121.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 50.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.6%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 59.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamEgyptian
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 98.5%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 95.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 89.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamEgyptian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamEgyptian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 84.9%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 76.5%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (67.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamEgyptian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
28.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 31.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamEgyptian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
88.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 84.7%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 81.4%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 77.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamEgyptian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
63.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
17.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 96.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 72.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.5%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Egyptian Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamEgyptian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%