Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from El Salvador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from El Salvador

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from El Salvador Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,438,866 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.303% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 303.1 Immigrants from El Salvador.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from El Salvador Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($61,663 compared to $81,213, a difference of 31.7%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $92,545, a difference of 28.2%), and per capita income ($30,256 compared to $38,394, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $36,673, a difference of 10.4%), and median earnings ($36,349 compared to $42,413, a difference of 16.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from El Salvador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$38,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$92,545
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$81,213
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$42,413
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$47,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$36,673
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$54,599
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$86,913
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$93,176
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$58,226
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 84.6%), male poverty (22.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 78.2%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 32.4%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 47.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from El Salvador
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
11.0%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
20.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
13.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 81.1%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 79.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 72.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from El Salvador
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from El Salvador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
81.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 36.8%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.53 compared to 3.49, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from El Salvador
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
67.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
44.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
43.1%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
36.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 49.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from El Salvador
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Average
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 67.7%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (77.5% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.16%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and 12th grade, no diploma (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from El Salvador
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
95.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
95.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
94.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
94.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
93.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
90.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
90.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
89.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
86.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
85.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
83.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
80.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
77.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
56.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
51.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
38.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
31.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 101.0%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 61.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from El Salvador
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.5%