Tohono O'odham vs British Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
British
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

British

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,012
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
92nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

British Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,225,543 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 9.3 British.
Tohono O'odham Integration in British Communities

Tohono O'odham vs British Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and British communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $46,571, a difference of 53.9%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $108,705, a difference of 50.6%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $57,890, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,477, a difference of 13.8%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,772, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $63,940, a difference of 30.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs British Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamBritish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$46,571
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$108,705
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$88,914
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$48,189
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$57,890
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Average
$39,772
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Poor
$51,477
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Excellent
$98,359
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$106,264
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$63,940
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.9%

Tohono O'odham vs British Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and British communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 160.7%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 157.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 121.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 31.0%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 47.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 50.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs British Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamBritish
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
9.7%

Tohono O'odham vs British Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and British communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 111.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 106.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs British Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamBritish
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Tohono O'odham vs British Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 9.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs British Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamBritish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
40.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Fair
82.6%

Tohono O'odham vs British Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and British communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 71.6%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 61.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs British Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamBritish
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Good
30.8%

Tohono O'odham vs British Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 105.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs British Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamBritish
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
60.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.2%

Tohono O'odham vs British Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 76.9%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 68.9%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 65.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.68%).
Tohono O'odham vs British Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamBritish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
87.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
62.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
40.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Tohono O'odham vs British Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 56.8%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs British Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamBritish
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%