Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Filipinos

Tragic
Exceptional
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Filipino Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,029,000 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.436% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 435.9 Filipinos.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Filipino Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $59,066, a difference of 95.2%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $138,397, a difference of 91.7%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $74,224, a difference of 87.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $57,740, a difference of 27.6%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 34.1%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $49,508, a difference of 49.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamFilipino
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$59,066
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$138,397
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$115,509
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$61,197
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$74,224
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$49,508
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$57,740
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$128,723
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$134,910
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$76,686
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
29.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 206.8%), receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 190.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 184.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 56.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 63.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 67.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamFilipino
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
24.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 114.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 108.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 104.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamFilipino
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamFilipino
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
31.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
71.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 116.9%), single father households (3.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 112.0%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 94.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.20, a difference of 10.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamFilipino
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
51.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
23.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 50.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamFilipino
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
6.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 165.7%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 141.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 135.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamFilipino
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
89.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
75.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
71.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
59.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
52.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
23.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
3.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 108.0%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 107.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Filipino Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamFilipino
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
19.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%