Immigrants from Scotland vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Chippewa
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,374,584 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 45.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 17.7% | 78.4% |
| Range | 16.2% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 25.6% |
| Median | 9.5% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |