Creek vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,440,447 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.504% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 503.5 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $82,062, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $48,720, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $72,660, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $47,930, a difference of 2.9%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $40,932, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $53,681, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 21.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 50.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 47.9%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 6.4%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.54%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.5%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and female disability (15.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.7%).