Ecuadorian vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,125,779 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 8.5 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $37,072, a difference of 13.2%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $72,660, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $34,677, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $53,681, a difference of 2.4%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $47,930, a difference of 7.6%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $87,872, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 38.9%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 33.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 66.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.30%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 25.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 0.87%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.99%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 110.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 98.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 14.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 77.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.2%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 60.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 48.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.7%).