Chinese vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,887,963 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 32.528% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 32,527.7 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,681, a difference of 44.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $83,588, a difference of 39.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $72,660, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.9%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $47,930, a difference of 18.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $40,932, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 67.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 67.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 26.6%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 39.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 93.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 67.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.9%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.99%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.8%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 40.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.1%).