Icelander vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,490,395 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 172.0 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $83,588, a difference of 22.3%), per capita income ($44,987 compared to $37,072, a difference of 21.3%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $87,872, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $48,720, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $34,677, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 57.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.8%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 92.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 56.1%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 48.3%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.6%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 6.7%).