Celtic vs Shoshone Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
Shoshone
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
Shoshone
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Shoshone Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,658,852 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 159.5 Shoshone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2095e/2095ea8217065b3db2412d8300dd3f119adf7575" alt="Celtic Integration in Shoshone Communities"
Celtic vs Shoshone Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $83,588, a difference of 18.3%), per capita income ($43,621 compared to $37,072, a difference of 17.7%), and median family income ($101,139 compared to $87,872, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $48,720, a difference of 3.5%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $34,677, a difference of 10.4%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21d34/21d34bfbd1aa8fb7b4fcd0956160bdc51355f033" alt="Celtic vs Shoshone Income"
Income Metric | Celtic | Shoshone |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Tragic $37,072 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Tragic $87,872 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Tragic $72,660 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Tragic $40,932 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Tragic $47,930 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Tragic $34,677 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Tragic $48,720 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Tragic $82,062 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Tragic $83,588 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Tragic $53,681 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Good 25.4% |
Celtic vs Shoshone Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.6%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73292/73292a9ad11e3a66751d4b8efce2e6d3805c79bf" alt="Celtic vs Shoshone Poverty"
Poverty Metric | Celtic | Shoshone |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 20.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 25.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Poor 12.4% |
Celtic vs Shoshone Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 58.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.5%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.8%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82156/82156dcaef19070e6d62c460155218a0df1c4dc9" alt="Celtic vs Shoshone Unemployment"
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | Shoshone |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Celtic vs Shoshone Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb132/cb13257b7ad3af4c51a1c8f69f85cba069fac480" alt="Celtic vs Shoshone Labor Participation"
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | Shoshone |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Exceptional 39.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 79.3% |
Celtic vs Shoshone Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 6.0%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf0f1/cf0f1e81a17fb09b3428757faf7fe58a24020f69" alt="Celtic vs Shoshone Family Structure"
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | Shoshone |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 43.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 35.3% |
Celtic vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 14.9%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45c0a/45c0abe78361ac9816ffc8018292782c654a1882" alt="Celtic vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability"
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | Shoshone |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Celtic vs Shoshone Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.3%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 32.9%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e99ba/e99ba61623f361a98461d2d39274c8cc51a56d43" alt="Celtic vs Shoshone Education Level"
Education Level Metric | Celtic | Shoshone |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Tragic 83.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 38.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 29.3% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Celtic vs Shoshone Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 12.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aab3a/aab3a219ba2df9444a05d4863b29a767942ae45e" alt="Celtic vs Shoshone Disability"
Disability Metric | Celtic | Shoshone |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Tragic 49.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |