Icelander vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,731,381 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.451% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 451.4 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $103,486, a difference of 8.3%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $42,275, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($46,916 compared to $50,280, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $61,902, a difference of 1.0%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $107,775, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.4%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.25%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.4%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.28%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 35.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.6%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.66%), disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%).