Creek vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,705,569 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 30.3 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $103,486, a difference of 38.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $107,775, a difference of 36.5%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $91,605, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $61,902, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $54,484, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.6%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.71%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 67.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 62.6%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 58.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.39%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 57.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.5%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.7%).