Choctaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,895,682 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 20.2 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $48,027, a difference of 33.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $103,486, a difference of 32.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $107,775, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $61,902, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,484, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 41.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.9%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 65.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 55.9%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 50.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.32%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 52.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.2%).