Malaysian vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,772,472 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $49,152, a difference of 18.5%), median family income ($95,230 compared to $84,981, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($81,064 compared to $73,392, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $50,655, a difference of 1.9%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $37,383, a difference of 4.9%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $34,942, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 52.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 25.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.3%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 16.8%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and college, under 1 year (62.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 5th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 7th grade (94.8% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.3%).