Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,589,549 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.390. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($125,150 compared to $84,981, a difference of 47.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $81,483, a difference of 44.9%), and per capita income ($53,806 compared to $37,383, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $50,655, a difference of 12.8%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and median female earnings ($46,502 compared to $34,942, a difference of 33.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 95.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.0%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 57.3%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 59.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 115.2%), master's degree (20.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 72.5%), and professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.10%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.8%).