Immigrants from Asia vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,660,938 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.659. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 11.9 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($118,291 compared to $84,981, a difference of 39.2%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $49,152, a difference of 37.5%), and median household income ($99,933 compared to $73,392, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $50,655, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $34,942, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 84.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 52.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.0%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 47.0%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.56%), family households (66.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 76.2%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 52.5%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.85%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.7%).