Asian vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 351,003,338 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.682. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($119,955 compared to $84,981, a difference of 41.2%), householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $49,152, a difference of 40.0%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $73,392, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $50,655, a difference of 12.5%), wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $34,942, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 88.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 54.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.8%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 47.1%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.89%), family households (66.5% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 76.4%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 52.7%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%).