Immigrants from South Central Asia vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,601,202 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of British within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and British communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $88,914, a difference of 19.3%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $57,890, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $98,359, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $63,940, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $51,477, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and British communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 24.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 24.8%), divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (50.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (66.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and British communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.1%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.30%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.7%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.7%).