Creek vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,554,195 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of British within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 15.1 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and British communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $106,264, a difference of 34.6%), median family income ($82,560 compared to $108,705, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $98,359, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,477, a difference of 13.5%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $39,772, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and British communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 48.8%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 22.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and British communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 3.0%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.25%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 62.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.0%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and British communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 45.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.6%).